From the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC):
Deaths from prescription painkillers have reached epidemic levels in the past decade. The number of overdose deaths is now greater than those of deaths from heroin and cocaine combined. A big part of the problem is nonmedical use of prescription painkillers—using drugs without a prescription, or using drugs just for the "high" they cause.
Showing posts with label CDC. Show all posts
Showing posts with label CDC. Show all posts
Strong alcohol regulations save us money
While researchers continue to find that substance abuse prevention saves money (see yesterday's post), a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) study adds to what we know about the high cost of excessive alcohol consumption.
Underage drinking is included in the definition of excessive alcohol consumption. According to the study, 12% of the economic costs of excessive consumption were related to underage drinking. The largest share of underage drinking costs were related to "lost productivity" due to premature death.
Here is part of CADCA's summary of the findings:
Excessive alcohol consumption is responsible for an average of 79,000 deaths and 2.3 million years of potential life lost in the United States each year, said CDC Director Thomas R. Frieden, M.D., M.P.H., in a press conference held Monday.
Researchers found the costs largely resulted from losses in workplace productivity (72 percent of the total cost), health care expenses for problems caused by excessive drinking (11 percent of the total cost), law enforcement and other criminal justice expenses related to excessive alcohol consumption (9 percent of the total cost), and motor vehicle crash costs from impaired driving (6 percent of the total cost). The study did not consider a number of other costs such as those due to pain and suffering by the excessive drinker or others who were affected by the drinking, and thus may be an underestimate. Researchers estimated that excessive drinking cost $746 per person in the United States in 2006.
“This research captures the reality that binge drinking means binge spending, not just for the person who drinks but for families, communities, and society,” Dr. Frieden said. “There are substantial costs to all of us in health care, the workplace, and criminal justice systems. Responsible individual behavior combined with the effective policies can decrease unhealthy drinking, reduce health care and other costs, and increase productivity.”
The authors of the study (published in the American Journal of Preventive Medicine, November 2011) conclude by saying, ". . . this study shows that the economic impact of excessive alcohol consumption is quite comparable to the economic impact of other leading health-risk behaviors, such as smoking and physical inactivity." Among the policies they cite as being effective in preventing excessive consumption are increasing the price of alcohol, limiting alcohol outlet density, and keeping the legal drinking age of 21. In other words, strong alcohol regulations can save us money.
Underage drinking is included in the definition of excessive alcohol consumption. According to the study, 12% of the economic costs of excessive consumption were related to underage drinking. The largest share of underage drinking costs were related to "lost productivity" due to premature death.
Here is part of CADCA's summary of the findings:
Excessive alcohol consumption is responsible for an average of 79,000 deaths and 2.3 million years of potential life lost in the United States each year, said CDC Director Thomas R. Frieden, M.D., M.P.H., in a press conference held Monday.
Researchers found the costs largely resulted from losses in workplace productivity (72 percent of the total cost), health care expenses for problems caused by excessive drinking (11 percent of the total cost), law enforcement and other criminal justice expenses related to excessive alcohol consumption (9 percent of the total cost), and motor vehicle crash costs from impaired driving (6 percent of the total cost). The study did not consider a number of other costs such as those due to pain and suffering by the excessive drinker or others who were affected by the drinking, and thus may be an underestimate. Researchers estimated that excessive drinking cost $746 per person in the United States in 2006.
“This research captures the reality that binge drinking means binge spending, not just for the person who drinks but for families, communities, and society,” Dr. Frieden said. “There are substantial costs to all of us in health care, the workplace, and criminal justice systems. Responsible individual behavior combined with the effective policies can decrease unhealthy drinking, reduce health care and other costs, and increase productivity.”
The authors of the study (published in the American Journal of Preventive Medicine, November 2011) conclude by saying, ". . . this study shows that the economic impact of excessive alcohol consumption is quite comparable to the economic impact of other leading health-risk behaviors, such as smoking and physical inactivity." Among the policies they cite as being effective in preventing excessive consumption are increasing the price of alcohol, limiting alcohol outlet density, and keeping the legal drinking age of 21. In other words, strong alcohol regulations can save us money.
Despite CDC recommendation against further liquor privatization, debate continues in WA
Backers of the latest liquor privatization initiative funded a paid-signature drive and turned in petitions today. I-1183 is similar to two measures to privatize state liquor sales that failed last November. I-1105 was rejected by 63% of voters and I-1100 was tossed out by 53%.
In February, the federal Centers for Disease Control’s Task Force on Community Preventive Services recommended against further privatization of alcohol sales “based on strong evidence that privatization results in increased per capita alcohol consumption, a well-established proxy for excessive consumption.”
"Privatization may be associated with increased alcohol advertising, increases in the number of brands sold, and more lax enforcement of sales regulations, including enforcement of the minimum legal drinking age. In contrast, privatization also has generally been associated with an increase in the price of privatized beverages, which may be expected to lead to a decrease in consumption."
CDC recommends against further liquor store privatization
This morning, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Task Force on Community Prevention Services announced the decision and rationale for recommending against further privatization of alcohol sales. The website states, "Based on its charge to identify effective disease and injury prevention measures, the Task Force on Community Preventive Services recommends against the further privatization of alcohol sales in settings with current government control of retail sales, based on strong evidence that privatization results in increased per capita alcohol consumption."
The Washington State legislature is currently considering legislation that would chip away at the state's liquor control system.
-- One House budget plan includes a proposal to privatize the wholesale distribution of liquor in the state.
-- SB 5917 would allow the co-location of liquor stores in up to ten urban grocery stores.
The Washington State legislature is currently considering legislation that would chip away at the state's liquor control system.
-- One House budget plan includes a proposal to privatize the wholesale distribution of liquor in the state.
-- SB 5917 would allow the co-location of liquor stores in up to ten urban grocery stores.
Adolescent health care providers call for binge drinking prevention activities
The Society for Adolescent Health and Medicine (SAHM) is hosting their annual meeting in Seattle this week and I was looking at their website and came across their October 2010 press release about binge drinking. Following are a few excerpts:
In light of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) recently released report on binge drinking among high school students and adults in the United States in 2009, the Society for Adolescent Health and Medicine (SAHM) called today for strong and directed action by health care professionals, community and policy leaders, local officials, schools, religious groups and community members to develop and implement programs and policies to curb the rise in binge drinking among adolescents and young adults in the United States.
“This report reaffirms,” said Dr. William Adelman, Chair of SAHM’s Alcohol and Drug subcommittee, “that binge drinking is a particularly serious problem for adolescents as well as adults in the United States but that the majority of underage drinkers are apparently learning to drink alcohol with the expressed goal of intoxication. It is no surprise then, that binge drinking disproportionately affects those in high school and then through age 25, too often with tragic outcomes.”
. . . community-based interventions such as those recommended in the Guide to Community Preventive Services are recommended resources for broader efforts.
Among the interventions recommended in the guide are:
-- Increasing alcohol taxes
-- Maintaining limits on days of sale
-- Maintaining limits on hours of sale
-- Regulation of alcohol outlet density
-- Enhanced enforcement of laws prohibiting sales to minors
In light of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) recently released report on binge drinking among high school students and adults in the United States in 2009, the Society for Adolescent Health and Medicine (SAHM) called today for strong and directed action by health care professionals, community and policy leaders, local officials, schools, religious groups and community members to develop and implement programs and policies to curb the rise in binge drinking among adolescents and young adults in the United States.
“This report reaffirms,” said Dr. William Adelman, Chair of SAHM’s Alcohol and Drug subcommittee, “that binge drinking is a particularly serious problem for adolescents as well as adults in the United States but that the majority of underage drinkers are apparently learning to drink alcohol with the expressed goal of intoxication. It is no surprise then, that binge drinking disproportionately affects those in high school and then through age 25, too often with tragic outcomes.”
. . . community-based interventions such as those recommended in the Guide to Community Preventive Services are recommended resources for broader efforts.
Among the interventions recommended in the guide are:
-- Increasing alcohol taxes
-- Maintaining limits on days of sale
-- Maintaining limits on hours of sale
-- Regulation of alcohol outlet density
-- Enhanced enforcement of laws prohibiting sales to minors
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)